|
The
year everything changed
Ian
Verrender
Sydney Morning Herald
July 5, 2008
The
stormclouds are gathering. Our market has plunged below 5000 for
the first time in two years, oil prices are soaring, America is in
(unofficial) recession and the Reserve Bank is clearly worried
about the home front.
After
years of partying, many believe it's time for the inevitable
hangover when gloom and doom replace the exuberant optimism that
just a few months ago seemed as though it would never
end.
But how
much of this is just another cyclical downturn and how much of it
is related to a more permanent shift?
I'm
going to go out on a limb here with a couple of bold predictions. I
think we are at a pivotal point in history; that we are witnessing
the early stages of a massive shift in the global economy, in the
balance of power and in the way we live.
Australia has become a
barometer for these far-reaching changes. We are being pulled in
opposite directions as we send vast quantities of resources off to
China while a virus that started on Wall Street and spread across
the US and Europe has infected our financial system.
In years
to come, it's quite probable we will look back at 2008 as the year
in which everything changed. And most of the changes being wrought
upon us relate to energy, our use of it and its cost.
There
are several powerful forces at work at the moment; some cyclical
and some far more fundamental.
Let's
look at the cyclical ones first. The worst credit squeeze in
history is under way. Given it follows the biggest debt binge the
world has ever seen, it's not surprising. On top of that we have a
recession under way in the US.
On their
own, those events are not particularly worrying. Markets and
economies go up. And then they go down. What is worrying, however,
is that in the early stages of a recession, Wall Street's biggest
financial institutions already have been forced to go cap in hand
to the Middle East and Asia for emergency funding.
And
that's where we come to the more fundamental and permanent changes
at work on the global economy.
What is
happening in China and, to a lesser extent, India is akin to what
occurred in North America in the 19th century. Back then, the
balance of economic power shifted from the Old World to the New
World. It's happening again now.
There
are differences - vast differences - in this new shift. Unlike the
rise of North America, China and India already have vast
populations. And as these populations move rapidly from Third World
to First World, they will demand more resources, to live the
lifestyle we enjoy.
Until
recently, both these nations were low-cost exporters, providing
cheap manufactures to the West. In reality, their main export was
low inflation as our clothing and electronic goods became ever
cheaper.
Now they
are becoming self-sufficient economies - similar to the US. Their
own economies are fuelling their growth and they are becoming less
reliant on exports.
Tom
Albanese, the head of the mining giant Rio Tinto, doesn't exactly
see eye to eye with BHP Billiton's chief executive Marius Kloppers
on much.
But the
one thing they do agree on is China. Both see continued strong
economic growth for years, and even stronger growth in the appetite
for metals.
Metals
are one thing. The real change being wrought on us is in energy.
And it is energy - or rather the cost of energy - that will
determine our future.
It was
energy that started the Industrial Revolution 200 years ago - when
we first started burning hydrocarbons in the form of coal. And it
was energy, in the form of oil, that sparked the transport
revolution a century ago.
You'd
have to be blind not to notice what is going on now. It's all over
the news, it hits you in the hip pocket every time you pull in at
the petrol pump.
Pfff,
we've had oil price spikes before, I hear you say. But the oil
price shocks of the 1970s were caused by an artificial restriction
of supply. This time around, the spike is being driven by demand.
And if you ask any seasoned oil explorer, even they now talk about
peak oil being just a few years off.
Peak oil
is the point where we are on the downhill run in known supplies.
There is still oil out there. But it is in ever deeper water, in
more politically unstable areas or in tar sands where the cost of
extraction has been so high it has been uneconomic. Some of it will
be developed, which will stabilise prices and perhaps even push
prices temporarily lower. But supplies are finite and demand is
soaring.
Think
about our energy use in the West. Take an average Australian of a
century ago and compare him or her with us in terms of our energy
consumption. We've got electricity on tap, 24 hours a day. We ride
around in fast fuel-guzzling cars. We leave home and land in Los
Angeles in 16 hours.
Until
recently, several billion Chinese lived as we did a century ago.
Imagine their energy demands rising to our levels and you'll
quickly figure oil prices aren't going to return to the levels of a
year ago.
Add to
that the damage we are doing to the environment in the form of
greenhouse gas emissions and the extra costs of pricing that damage
through carbon trading.
So is
this the ultimate disaster scenario?
Not
necessarily, according to a recent issue of The Economist. Higher
oil prices make alternative energy sources more viable - biofuels,
solar and wind power. And if money and expertise are invested in
those areas, they will become more efficient, more economic and
maybe, just maybe, lead to a bright future. But prepare for a lot
of pain along the way.
This
story was found at:
http://business.smh.com.au/the-year-everything-changed-20080704-31u6.html
|